Where this comes from
JuryPanel was built by a working trial prosecutor — someone who has spent more than 15 years picking juries in real courtrooms, not designing software in a conference room.
The frustration was simple. Prosecutors try more cases than any other lawyers in the country, and every jury selection tool on the market was built for somebody else — general litigation, the occasional big trial, big-firm budgets no DA's office could justify. So offices made do. Some bent someone else's software to fit. Most stuck with legal pads, sticky notes on a board, and the court's seating chart — a grid of seats that tells you nothing about who's sitting in them.
JuryPanel started as a personal tool. It became something worth sharing.
What this isn't
JuryPanel isn't a venture-backed software company. There are no investors demanding 10× returns, no growth-at-all-costs pressure. There's one prosecutor, building a tool prosecutors need, with a cost structure that makes affordable office-wide pricing actually sustainable.
That structure matters because it shapes everything downstream. JuryPanel doesn't carry the overhead that forces per-attorney monthly subscriptions, so it doesn't charge them. There are no higher tiers to upsell because there are no tiers. The product isn't optimized for revenue per customer — it's optimized for prosecutor's offices having a tool that works.
What we're committed to
Prosecution-first. JuryPanel is built for prosecutor's offices. Full stop. A civil litigation firm with a serious trial practice can reach out — we'll look for a fit. Defense-side and public defender's offices are not the market we serve.
Built by someone who still tries cases. Every product decision is filtered through one question: would the prosecutor who built this still want to use it tomorrow? Features that don't survive that question don't ship.
Government-priced. By design. $150 per attorney per year, office-wide license. We will not use a launch price as a hook and then raise it once your office is embedded.
Honest about what we are not. JuryPanel is not SOC 2 audited. It is not CJIS-certified. Juror data does not require those credentials. We will tell you that directly rather than dodge the question.
JuryPanel succeeds when prosecutors keep using it. Year after year. Trial after trial. That is the only thing we are building toward.
The prosecutor who built it is still trying cases. The product evolves on what every trial teaches — his and yours.
If you are evaluating whether this is real, the fastest answer is to book a demo. You will be talking to the person who built it. Bring the hard questions.